Take a look next time you're in the company of more than three Icelandic women and you'll notice that the dominant colour is black. Even in summer.
The 'high-street' fashion landscape here is sometimes so homogenous that women dress virtually indentically.
I've been witness to conversations where groups of women talk about Islamic countries, remark at how oppressive the burqa is, saying how they lucky they are to have been born here, whilst all wearing mainly black.
The irony of this is not lost on me.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Tip of the Day: Creating The Right Impression
If you're Icelandic and you want to create a good impression with English-speaking foreigners, having a ringtone that sings "...'cos I'm a muthafuckin' P.I.M.P." does not make you look professional, or even cool.
Monday, December 19, 2011
The UK For Newbies
The most effective way to insult anyone from the UK or Ireland is to accuse them of being from the wrong country. Here's a simple map to help:
Great Britain is the bit on the right: that's England, Scotland and Wales put together.
U.K. is actually an abbreviation of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. So that's Great Britain plus Northern Ireland.
Ireland is a completely seperate sovereign country. They have their own parliament and nothing to do with the British Monarchy. They have the Euro, whilst Great Britain has the Pound Sterling.
Northern Ireland is the top-right corner of the island of Ireland that comes under the remit of the UK. I'm not going to go into the history of this.
The Scottish people are rightly proud to be not English and get understandably very upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being English.
The Welsh people are rightly proud to be not English and get understandably very upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being English.
The English people get a bit upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being Scottish or Welsh.
So:
Scottish people, Welsh people, English people and Northern Irelanders are all from the UK.
England is not the UK.
The UK is not England.
All four places speak English, but the accents vary a lot by region. They can be very hard for visitors to understand. A friend of mine who grew up in southern England moved to Scotland and it took him two months to fully understand the local accent. Search for any interview with Sir Alex Ferguson on YouTube if you want an example.
In some parts of Wales, Welsh is the first language. In some parts of Scotland, Gælic is still used.
Icelanders: if you want to understand the effect of getting this wrong, try to imagine how you would feel if someone said "Ah yes, Iceland. That's part of Norway, right?"
Great Britain is the bit on the right: that's England, Scotland and Wales put together.
U.K. is actually an abbreviation of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. So that's Great Britain plus Northern Ireland.
Ireland is a completely seperate sovereign country. They have their own parliament and nothing to do with the British Monarchy. They have the Euro, whilst Great Britain has the Pound Sterling.
Northern Ireland is the top-right corner of the island of Ireland that comes under the remit of the UK. I'm not going to go into the history of this.
The Scottish people are rightly proud to be not English and get understandably very upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being English.
The Welsh people are rightly proud to be not English and get understandably very upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being English.
The English people get a bit upset when people ignorantly refer to them as being Scottish or Welsh.
So:
Scottish people, Welsh people, English people and Northern Irelanders are all from the UK.
England is not the UK.
The UK is not England.
All four places speak English, but the accents vary a lot by region. They can be very hard for visitors to understand. A friend of mine who grew up in southern England moved to Scotland and it took him two months to fully understand the local accent. Search for any interview with Sir Alex Ferguson on YouTube if you want an example.
In some parts of Wales, Welsh is the first language. In some parts of Scotland, Gælic is still used.
Icelanders: if you want to understand the effect of getting this wrong, try to imagine how you would feel if someone said "Ah yes, Iceland. That's part of Norway, right?"
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Overseas Travel
Overheard recently:
Icelander #1: I've not seen you for a while, where have you been?
Icelander #2: I was abroad for a few days.
Icelander #1: Ah, of course. Is Tivoli open this time of year?
Icelander #1: I've not seen you for a while, where have you been?
Icelander #2: I was abroad for a few days.
Icelander #1: Ah, of course. Is Tivoli open this time of year?
Friday, December 16, 2011
Don't Use A Handkerchief In Iceland
One of the most obvious indicators of cultural difference between the Icelanders and Brits is the attitude to nose clearing.
In Iceland it's considered disgusting to blow your nose in front of other people. You are expected to do this in the lavatory.
Even more disgusting is the use of the handkerchief, apparently because the user not only often inspects the outcome of the nose-blow, but then puts the handkerchief back in their pocket.
Brits that visit me here are disgusted by the Icelandic way of clearing their noses; it's done by simply sucking hard up the nose, then swallowing the product.
It's normal to do that in company here, whilst sitting at one's desk or even at the dinner table. It's not considered spectacularly rude.
Most Icelanders that I know will, upon departure of a handkerchief-using Brit, animatedly explain to their friends how disgusting they found it to watch the Brit use the handkerchief at the dinner table.
Most British and American expats that I know find the suck-up-the-nose habit a bit gross.
The strength of the tradition for handkerchief use amongst Brits is illustrated by a story from an ex-colleague: he went to a fairly generic grammar school in Wales and explained that they had a strict rule that every boy must carry a clean hankerchief at all times. The headmaster would periodically check this by asking everyone to stand during morning assembly, then thrust his hand into his pocket, retrieve his hanky and raise his hand. Anyone failing to hold a hanky, or even committing the crime of holding a soiled hanky, was punished.
In Iceland it's considered disgusting to blow your nose in front of other people. You are expected to do this in the lavatory.
Even more disgusting is the use of the handkerchief, apparently because the user not only often inspects the outcome of the nose-blow, but then puts the handkerchief back in their pocket.
Brits that visit me here are disgusted by the Icelandic way of clearing their noses; it's done by simply sucking hard up the nose, then swallowing the product.
It's normal to do that in company here, whilst sitting at one's desk or even at the dinner table. It's not considered spectacularly rude.
Most Icelanders that I know will, upon departure of a handkerchief-using Brit, animatedly explain to their friends how disgusting they found it to watch the Brit use the handkerchief at the dinner table.
Most British and American expats that I know find the suck-up-the-nose habit a bit gross.
The strength of the tradition for handkerchief use amongst Brits is illustrated by a story from an ex-colleague: he went to a fairly generic grammar school in Wales and explained that they had a strict rule that every boy must carry a clean hankerchief at all times. The headmaster would periodically check this by asking everyone to stand during morning assembly, then thrust his hand into his pocket, retrieve his hanky and raise his hand. Anyone failing to hold a hanky, or even committing the crime of holding a soiled hanky, was punished.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Icelanders Are Sociopathic
I was picking up a friend from Keflavík airport recently and had a classic demonstration of Icelandic behaviour.
The arrivals space in the lovely 'Kef' is now fairly typical of the genre, if somewhat smaller: there's a large sliding door where the arriving passengers emerge, a ribbon-barriered broad walkway down which they walk while they squint and scan the crowd for their loved ones, and an open space in front of that where said loved ones wait. This open space would probably hold around five hundred people rock-concert style, or comfortably around fifty Japanese or English people if their personal space rules were to be not infringed.
I got there very early and stood somewhere just forward of off-centre in the open space. There were five or ten other people there: most of them lingering towards the front, a few at the front corners and the remainder randomly scattered.
Here's a crappy picture that neatly illustrates the point:
So there I stood, patiently waiting and doing what any good nerd does these days: checking my Twitter feeds and reading The Grauniad on my smartphone. All in the world was good. My plan to get there early and chill out was working just fine.
The arrivals space in the lovely 'Kef' is now fairly typical of the genre, if somewhat smaller: there's a large sliding door where the arriving passengers emerge, a ribbon-barriered broad walkway down which they walk while they squint and scan the crowd for their loved ones, and an open space in front of that where said loved ones wait. This open space would probably hold around five hundred people rock-concert style, or comfortably around fifty Japanese or English people if their personal space rules were to be not infringed.
I got there very early and stood somewhere just forward of off-centre in the open space. There were five or ten other people there: most of them lingering towards the front, a few at the front corners and the remainder randomly scattered.
Here's a crappy picture that neatly illustrates the point:
So there I stood, patiently waiting and doing what any good nerd does these days: checking my Twitter feeds and reading The Grauniad on my smartphone. All in the world was good. My plan to get there early and chill out was working just fine.People started to fill the space, until most of the space was taken up and there were obvious walkways in between the human obstructions. Here's a picture no less crappy than the previous one that shows this:
The inevitable then happened: people starting using the walkway directly in front of me and I was being treated as the human equivalent of a wall: something to graze or bump off. I was standing as you'd expect someone to stand using a smartphone: holding the phone around sternum level with one hand, whilst gently caressing it -er, sorry: scrolling- with the other hand. This meant that the phone was sticking out maybe ten centimetres from my body.
This was clearly too much for Siggi and his pals to handle. As they were walking past me, my finely-tuned proximity alarms were going off like mad and warning me of impending collisions, of people walking straight at me and that if I didn't get out of the way a collision would happen. A couple of years' living in London taught me the gentle give-and-take dance that the people in cities in real countries develop, that Brownian motion of being in close proximity whilst not invading other people's space. The people coming past me were walking straight through the space occupied by my phone. They were clipping it with their arms and nearly knocking it out of my hand. I found I had to hold tightly on to it for fear that I would actually lose grip.
I decided to carry out a small experiment and see what would happen if I fought the Brownian motion instinct and just stood my ground. The bumping got worse.
I decided to carry out a small experiment and see what would happen if I fought the Brownian motion instinct and just stood my ground. The bumping got worse.
Then, a glorious thing happened. The actions of one man demonstrated so clearly the collective instinct of the Icelanders when it comes to thoughtfulness, consideration for other people and social awareness.
A man wearing worn-out sports clothing, scruffy black sneakers, a cheap gold necklace and unwashed hair stood directly in front of me, with his woman at his side. See picture.
The distance from the front edge of my phone to the centre of his back was round ten centimetres. Unlike many of my anecdotes, this is absolutely true.
So not only was Captain Cretin completely blocking my view, he was also seriously invading my personal space. He'd obviously planted himself there because he wanted a clear view of the arriving travellers and it didn't even occur to him to that he might have been blocking someone's view.
The proximity alarms in my head were now screaming: 'Ah-ROO-GAA!... Ah-ROOOOO-GAA!!!'.
But, no. I stubbornly stayed where I was and made the sacrifice of my comfort for the sake of social science. I decided it would be interesting to see what Captain Cretin would do next.
He surpassed himself. He was so keen to get a good look at the arriving people that he was bobbing and weaving a lot to get a better view. A quick glance confirmed why he needed to do this: yet another peasant farmer had planted himself right in front and blocked his view.
In the course of his bobbing he actually backed into me. Several times.
In a country where social history is measured in units larger than nanoseconds this would have been the offense that prompted gushing apologies and made him realise that he was standing way too close to me. But, no. Our superhero did nothing whatsoever. It clearly didn't even register with him and that's the interesting point: he saw nothing wrong whatsoever with what he was doing. To him it was perfectly normal behaviour. He wasn't trying to to be rude, boorish or ignorant; he was just standing waiting for someone. If he'd wanted to be rude, he would have done something rude by his standards, like the fart-cup-sniff-assess trick, or spitting on the floor. Or far, far worse: pulled out a handkerchief, loudly blown his nose, examined the product and put the handkerchief back in his pocket.
A quick skim of the interwebs turned up this interesting information about sociopathy. It tells us that what used to be called Sociopathy is defined as:
"...a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood."
...which means that according to this definition, Icelanders are Sociopathic.
Footnote:
How can I be so generalised? Well, I've lived here long enough to know that this is typical behaviour, not just for white trash and didn't-learn-it-in-school seventy year old taxi drivers, but typical behaviour even for apparently civilised people in business suits.
This may actually be a more accurate definition, giving us the following:
This may actually be a more accurate definition, giving us the following:
"Anti-social behaviour is behaviour that lacks consideration for others and that may cause damage to society, whether intentionally or through negligence, as opposed to pro-social behaviour, behaviour that helps or benefits society."
...but the effect is the same, methinks.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Yet Another Great Piece Of Journalism
A very nicely made video from The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/video/2011/dec/13/iceland-volcano-eyjafjallajokull-marcel-theroux-video
...but of course, they got the crucial detail wrong: he wasn't on Eyjafjallajökull, he was on the col between Eyjafjallajökull and Mýrdalsjökull named Fimmvörðuháls. This is where the earlier of the two eruptions took place.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/video/2011/dec/13/iceland-volcano-eyjafjallajokull-marcel-theroux-video
...but of course, they got the crucial detail wrong: he wasn't on Eyjafjallajökull, he was on the col between Eyjafjallajökull and Mýrdalsjökull named Fimmvörðuháls. This is where the earlier of the two eruptions took place.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
There Are No Trains In Iceland
There are no trains in Iceland. This is not because the population and the economy are too small to justify it. It's because the whole idea of punctuality doesn't exist in Iceland.
Icelanders are at least seventeen minutes late to everything. I've been here eight years and the only thing I've ever seen them arrive punctually to is funerals. No: hang on, the last one I went to saw some stragglers drift in a few minutes late. No, I think I can safely say that Icelanders are late for everything.
A train system where passengers expect to be able to lean out of the window and call to the driver: "Hey, hang on a minute, Siggi will be here in five minutes, he just SMSd me!" just wouldn't work.
Icelanders are at least seventeen minutes late to everything. I've been here eight years and the only thing I've ever seen them arrive punctually to is funerals. No: hang on, the last one I went to saw some stragglers drift in a few minutes late. No, I think I can safely say that Icelanders are late for everything.
A train system where passengers expect to be able to lean out of the window and call to the driver: "Hey, hang on a minute, Siggi will be here in five minutes, he just SMSd me!" just wouldn't work.
Monday, December 12, 2011
How To Ask The Time In Iceland
Asking the time in Iceland is not the same as it is in the UK or the USA. It's one of the best ways to show the social differences between the Anglo-Saxon and Icelandic approaches.
If an Icelander were to ask a Briton, the Icelander would come across as abrupt, possibly pushy, even rude. He'd say "Hey, what time is it?", and nothing more. He'd expect a short answer: "Quarter past ten.", to which he'd reply simply "Thanks". He may even not say thanks.
A Brit, on the other hand, would do the full humble-polite-apologetice routine: "Excuse me, er, sorry to bother you, but could you tell me what the time is please?", then when told would reply in similar detail: "Oh, thank you. I'm in such a hurry, off to this meeting, you see. Anyway, thankyou...".
What's interesting about it is that this sort of expansive courtesy and choreography come across as affected, possibly even silly to the Icelanders. The two societies' approaches to this are neatly polarised: the Icelanders value pragmatism and simply do not have the hundreds of years of social tweaking or the influence of the Victorians or the French aristocracy from whom the Brits learned their affected ways. To them, asking in a direct way is polite: it doesn't waste anyone's time and allows the exchange to be over quickly, meaning they can rapidly get back to important things like surviving the winter.
The Brits would find the Icelanders' directness simply rude. Curt and interrupting, their social efficiency would socially unbalance the Brits, who are unused to having their personal space invaded without warning.
What's interesting about this is that both cultures can cause friction, possibly even offense or annoyance simply by trying to be polite, or at least 'polite' as it is defined in their own social frame of reference.
It took me a few years to really grasp this and whilst I learnt to adapt and suppress my learned reactions, there are still times when something grates or I find myself needing to make just a little bit of effort to understand that the Icelanders are not trying to be rude. I find it interesting to realise how ingrained are the social rules that I learned for the more than thirty years that it took for me to find my way to Iceland.
If an Icelander were to ask a Briton, the Icelander would come across as abrupt, possibly pushy, even rude. He'd say "Hey, what time is it?", and nothing more. He'd expect a short answer: "Quarter past ten.", to which he'd reply simply "Thanks". He may even not say thanks.
A Brit, on the other hand, would do the full humble-polite-apologetice routine: "Excuse me, er, sorry to bother you, but could you tell me what the time is please?", then when told would reply in similar detail: "Oh, thank you. I'm in such a hurry, off to this meeting, you see. Anyway, thankyou...".
What's interesting about it is that this sort of expansive courtesy and choreography come across as affected, possibly even silly to the Icelanders. The two societies' approaches to this are neatly polarised: the Icelanders value pragmatism and simply do not have the hundreds of years of social tweaking or the influence of the Victorians or the French aristocracy from whom the Brits learned their affected ways. To them, asking in a direct way is polite: it doesn't waste anyone's time and allows the exchange to be over quickly, meaning they can rapidly get back to important things like surviving the winter.
The Brits would find the Icelanders' directness simply rude. Curt and interrupting, their social efficiency would socially unbalance the Brits, who are unused to having their personal space invaded without warning.
What's interesting about this is that both cultures can cause friction, possibly even offense or annoyance simply by trying to be polite, or at least 'polite' as it is defined in their own social frame of reference.
It took me a few years to really grasp this and whilst I learnt to adapt and suppress my learned reactions, there are still times when something grates or I find myself needing to make just a little bit of effort to understand that the Icelanders are not trying to be rude. I find it interesting to realise how ingrained are the social rules that I learned for the more than thirty years that it took for me to find my way to Iceland.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Christmas
Outside my window it's a Christmas scene straight from a greetings card: a good cover of glistening snow, twinkling fairy lights and brooding winter twilight.
This weekend I made one of my annual Christmas shopping trips and for some reason I always have such mixed feelings. I resent the corruption of Christmas into a reatial-fest, of course, and as an atheist I see no point in celebrating the festival.
Iceland does Christmas rather nicely, I think it's fair to say. Since I've been here I've started to resent it less and actually enjoy it. Being with my Icelandic family, relaxing together and seeing the pleasure it brings to the children makes it worthwhile.
I've always felt that an end-of-year celebration is a very valid excuse for fesitivity and as such have always felt that New Year's Eve holds much more significance for me. Fortunately, the Icelanders know how to celebrate it with style.
I still have more shopping and planning to do, and no doubt won't be able to relax until it's completely done, but the feeling of being here is so much more mellow and less retail-manic than being in somewhere like the UK or USA.
I could rant for ages about the joys of Icelandic Christmas, but a few gems spring to mind:
The sale of trees and fireworks is organised by the rescue teams, and they benefit directly from it. It's nice to know that one's money goes to a good cause, rather than some evil capitalist empire.
Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and just about all social events involving children are generally alcohol-free, which is a welcome change from the traditions of my home land.
People are much happier here than in my home land, and the retail pressure is much less.
I think I can say I'm actually looking forward to the Christmas break now. I find it a little surprising. It will be a welcome break from the recent feeling of my life being like Groundhog Day.
This weekend I made one of my annual Christmas shopping trips and for some reason I always have such mixed feelings. I resent the corruption of Christmas into a reatial-fest, of course, and as an atheist I see no point in celebrating the festival.
Iceland does Christmas rather nicely, I think it's fair to say. Since I've been here I've started to resent it less and actually enjoy it. Being with my Icelandic family, relaxing together and seeing the pleasure it brings to the children makes it worthwhile.
I've always felt that an end-of-year celebration is a very valid excuse for fesitivity and as such have always felt that New Year's Eve holds much more significance for me. Fortunately, the Icelanders know how to celebrate it with style.
I still have more shopping and planning to do, and no doubt won't be able to relax until it's completely done, but the feeling of being here is so much more mellow and less retail-manic than being in somewhere like the UK or USA.
I could rant for ages about the joys of Icelandic Christmas, but a few gems spring to mind:
The sale of trees and fireworks is organised by the rescue teams, and they benefit directly from it. It's nice to know that one's money goes to a good cause, rather than some evil capitalist empire.
Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and just about all social events involving children are generally alcohol-free, which is a welcome change from the traditions of my home land.
People are much happier here than in my home land, and the retail pressure is much less.
I think I can say I'm actually looking forward to the Christmas break now. I find it a little surprising. It will be a welcome break from the recent feeling of my life being like Groundhog Day.
Monday, December 5, 2011
Nice Article
We like it when people write nice things about Iceland:
http://gourmettraveller.com.au/plunging-into-reykjavik.htm
http://gourmettraveller.com.au/plunging-into-reykjavik.htm
Friday, December 2, 2011
Snow
Well, winter is finally here.
We've had some cold temperatures recently, and the forecast is for below 10°c. There's about ten centimetres of snow everywhere and the effect on these dark December nights is great: it's so much brighter. Combine that with the Christmas lights (Icelanders are really terribly enthusiastic about them, and do it with style) and the effect is charming. Even for a Christmas curmudgeon such as myself.
It's at moments like this that I'm glad I drive a... well, what do I drive? The Merkins* and Ozzies would call it an SUV, the Brits would call it a 4x4, and the Icelanders simply call it a 'Yeppie', then when they translate it into English the origin of the word becomes clear: 'jeep'.
One of the joys of being here is having ski slopes just half an hour away. It's possible to take my gear into work, change after work, drive up to the mountain and be sitting on the first lift just an hour after standing up from my desk. The snowboarding is often best in the evening, floodlit and well-groomed. The best nights are cold, less than -3°c at the top of the mountain, with clear skies and little or no wind. The hill stays open through til 21:00 and there's often virtually noone there; lift queues are tiny. The texture of the snow becomes so visible and the riding is just heavenly on these evenings. If there's powder in the off piste areas, that just adds to the fun.
Having my beast of a truck really enhances the experience, knowing that I can get there and back even in the worst snow and not get bogged down in the parking lot. Ok, so it drinks like a problematic sixties rock star, but I don't really care. There are far worse vehicles on the road...
The website for the local ski area, Bláfjöll, is here. There's another area on the other side of town called Skálafell, which is better for snowboarding, but in recent years it's not been open very often. Even Bláfjöll has been struggling to open very much.
For reliable boarding it's best to go to Akureyri's wonderful Hlíðarfjall. From Reykjavík it's a five-hour drive or a very nice one-hour flight, which is quite cost-effective even for us empoverished locals.
*Americans, of course...
We've had some cold temperatures recently, and the forecast is for below 10°c. There's about ten centimetres of snow everywhere and the effect on these dark December nights is great: it's so much brighter. Combine that with the Christmas lights (Icelanders are really terribly enthusiastic about them, and do it with style) and the effect is charming. Even for a Christmas curmudgeon such as myself.
It's at moments like this that I'm glad I drive a... well, what do I drive? The Merkins* and Ozzies would call it an SUV, the Brits would call it a 4x4, and the Icelanders simply call it a 'Yeppie', then when they translate it into English the origin of the word becomes clear: 'jeep'.
One of the joys of being here is having ski slopes just half an hour away. It's possible to take my gear into work, change after work, drive up to the mountain and be sitting on the first lift just an hour after standing up from my desk. The snowboarding is often best in the evening, floodlit and well-groomed. The best nights are cold, less than -3°c at the top of the mountain, with clear skies and little or no wind. The hill stays open through til 21:00 and there's often virtually noone there; lift queues are tiny. The texture of the snow becomes so visible and the riding is just heavenly on these evenings. If there's powder in the off piste areas, that just adds to the fun.
Having my beast of a truck really enhances the experience, knowing that I can get there and back even in the worst snow and not get bogged down in the parking lot. Ok, so it drinks like a problematic sixties rock star, but I don't really care. There are far worse vehicles on the road...
The website for the local ski area, Bláfjöll, is here. There's another area on the other side of town called Skálafell, which is better for snowboarding, but in recent years it's not been open very often. Even Bláfjöll has been struggling to open very much.
For reliable boarding it's best to go to Akureyri's wonderful Hlíðarfjall. From Reykjavík it's a five-hour drive or a very nice one-hour flight, which is quite cost-effective even for us empoverished locals.
*Americans, of course...
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Christmas Brew, or 'Jólabjór'
This year I feel like I've been hearing more than the usual clamour about the Tuborg Christmas Brew.
It seems that my fellow rock-dwellers are in love with this Danish beer, and I find it regrettable. Why are they so enamoured by a mediocre beer from Denmark, when their own Christmas brews are so very, very good?
Could it be that it's one time of the year when any discernable difference can be noticed from the bland, urine-coloured concoction that is usually on offer? Is it yet more evidence of the special relationship?
Here's some interesting data, from this page.
What it shows is that Tuborg sold nearly twice as much as the best-selling local brew. Let's try to turn that around a bit, shall we? I've been celebrating the rise of the Icelandic beers, so here are some ideas:
Named after one of the 'Yule-Lads', this one's very appealing.
I visited the friendly chaps at Bruggsmiðjan recently and their Jólakaldi is great.
Egils Jólagull is a great-tasting brew, albeit from a big producer.
Egils Malt Jólabjór is a nice, chewy brew from the same people.
Einstök Doppel Bock Jólabjór looks like a bundle of laughs...
I've not sampled Gæðingur Jólabjór yet, so the brewers are more than welcome to send me a couple of bottles to review. I promise to be honest.
Please go out and try them, of only for the sake of the age-old wisdom that the best beer is the one that's travelled least.
I really do hope that the Icelandic beers gain a bigger foothold and that people see how amazing they are.
It seems that my fellow rock-dwellers are in love with this Danish beer, and I find it regrettable. Why are they so enamoured by a mediocre beer from Denmark, when their own Christmas brews are so very, very good?
Could it be that it's one time of the year when any discernable difference can be noticed from the bland, urine-coloured concoction that is usually on offer? Is it yet more evidence of the special relationship?
Here's some interesting data, from this page.
What it shows is that Tuborg sold nearly twice as much as the best-selling local brew. Let's try to turn that around a bit, shall we? I've been celebrating the rise of the Icelandic beers, so here are some ideas:
Named after one of the 'Yule-Lads', this one's very appealing.
Egils Malt Jólabjór is a nice, chewy brew from the same people.
Einstök Doppel Bock Jólabjór looks like a bundle of laughs...
I've not sampled Gæðingur Jólabjór yet, so the brewers are more than welcome to send me a couple of bottles to review. I promise to be honest.
Please go out and try them, of only for the sake of the age-old wisdom that the best beer is the one that's travelled least.
I really do hope that the Icelandic beers gain a bigger foothold and that people see how amazing they are.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Manners Maketh The Man
...or not, as the case may be.
This is a meme that's been churning over in my mind for at least eight years now and it's been growing as more and more evidence gets piled on. It's actually one of the reasons I created this blog, to get this garbage off my chest and to stop wasting spare mental CPU cycles on it.
I had sort of decided to take a responsible aproach to this, to do some fairly thorough research and make sure I have a balanced view of the issue, to make sure that when I spout fairly strong opinions I'm able to back them up and to defend myself. But then I though "Ah, bollocks. Just do it." Let someone correct me if I'm wrong (http://xkcd.com/386).
The thing is this. Icelanders like to think they're all sophisticated and worldly-wise and up with the Jónssons, and able to proudly rub shoulders with their Nordic and even Scandinavian counterparts, and have even had some fairly respectable HDI ratings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdi) to back it up recently.
But it's all bollocks! They're behaving like a bunch of social savages. The most generous I can be would be to describe them as a group of teenagers left home alone for a weekend. If countries were to be judged by their standards of etiquette and manners -and let's face it, they do sometimes get judged simply that way; isn't it called diplomacy?- Iceland would fail miserably.
I now I'm making some bold statements and quite frankly I find it rather difficult to give a toss who I upset: the truth needs to out. The people of this little skerry which I hold so dear are woefully behind in terms of social evolution and are making bloody fools of themselves because of it. I've been here long enough to work out what's going on and to see what most people are like, and here I present a brief list of common problems. Most of them stem from differences between social norms in Iceland and the way in which I was raised -a fairly middle-of-the-road Anglo-Saxon way- and of course we can debate at length the extent to which these conventions apply or not in Iceland.
In fact I'll go so far as to warn you, Icelanders: in this case you can't escape the truth or you social responsibility by crowing out the tired old mantra of "oh, but it's different here! We do things differently here because we're all so special and live in a special place and we're not like anyone else!". Bollocks. Utter horse manure. When it comes to how you interact with each other in your tiny little farm in the Westfjords you can do what you want, but in the modern paradigm Iceland is no longer so isolated that you can pretend that you have no contact with the outside world. You travel. People visit here, a lot, and pay damn good money for which they expect a certain internationally accepted standard of etiquette and manners. So invoking the "we're special because we sing like whales, eat stinky food and believe in elves" cry again is not going to cut it here.
There many aspects of the Icelanders' behaviour that merit comment, but for now I'm going to focus on matters of manners and etiquette; other quirks are big enough to merit their own blogs, not least becase a few of them tie neatly together into explanations of aspects of the national conscience.
What I present here is a straightforward guide for Icelanders to finally be as as cultured as they like to pretend they are whilst having a meal.
Mark my words carefully here: I write "having a meal" because to use the word "dining" would not be accurate. My fellow skerry-dwellers eat far too fast. A typical rythmn goes: cut, stab with fork, deliver to mouth, then whilst chewing, start cutting the next morsel. Not only is this downright rude, it's also antisocial and unhealthy. Where's the conversation? Where's the efficiant mastication? Isn't it the case that over half of the process of digestion should take place in the mouth?
I've been trying to get to the bottom of this and I've found out two or three reasons why people eat like hungry dogs here: i) They actively get taught to do so in infant and primary school. They get taught not to 'hang over' their food, and to hurry outside to play, ii) In a society in which everyone's a farmer (which Iceland was, just a few generations ago) and the growing season is very short, followed by fierce winters, there is no space for relaxed social dining during which the issues of the moment are ruminated as well as the food, and iii) whereas real countries like France or Germany or the UK or the USA have had anything from a few hundred to a few thousand years to develop social norms and etiquette, Iceland has had the social equivalent of about ten minutes. Social evolution here has simply been way too pragmatic to allow for such luxuries as civilised dining to develop.
The message in this case is very simple: cut your bite, put it in your mouth, then put your cutlery down. Chew slowly and carefully before swallowing, then when and only when your mouth is empty, may you speak.
Which takes us neatly on to the next faux pas that I see every day here. Literally every day. For some reason my beloved countrymen haven't learned that it's rude to talk with your mouth full of food. Eating lunch in the kitchen in my small company is a daily horror not only because of the turgidly boring food choice on offer, but mainly because of the animalistic display of behaviour. One particular employee, a middle-aged kerling with a face so sour that she looks like she is smelling someone else's fart, is a chief offender. Her normal talking voice is a high-piched Gatling variant of Icelandic but she continues with a mouth full of food and the effect is dreadful: she looks downright ignorant. I shudder to think how fellow diners at, for example, even a mid-range restaurant in Lyon, Geneva or Tokyo would react. What makes it worse is that she is far from the only offender; half the employees and even the CEO behave exactly the same way.
For heaven's sake, people, don't talk with your mouth full of food. It's disgusting and you look like white trash.
Fairly soon after I moved here I was 'dining' with family. As I raised my forkful of food to my mouth, the diner to my immediate right reached forward and left, leaning her body heavily against mine, and stretched across my personal space to where the water jug stood in the centre of the table. The food fell off my fork. I remember being shocked by this and wondering what sort of person this was, then as the weeks and years rolled by I saw that this was common behaviour here.
There really is no conception of personal space during dining, and hence no respect for it. The way in which I was raised -which I by no means hold up as a global standard, just normal- taught me that people do not touch each other during dinner. Everyone has their own personal space, elbows do not touch, knees do not touch under the table and one never, ever reaches across another person at the table: one asks to be passed whatever is needed.
The absence of this meme is again fairly obvious when one looks back into Icelandic history. Visit the wonderful Skogar Folk Museum and take a walk around their old buildings, go inside the beautifully built longhouse in þjórsádalur and you'll quickly understand that there simply was no space in these dwellings, so it's no surprise that the idea never sprung up.
But come on, people. You don't live in turf houses any more. You live in generic, generously-proportioned, Ikea-furnished, geothermally-heated houses and apartments now and the architects always plan nicely for a real dining table with place for everyone. I know; I've seen the plans. Learn the simple rules and stop behaving like apes while you eat.
There are quite a few more of these finer points of dining, but they seem so trivial, perhaps they really are just vestigial graces inherited from some Victorian or renaissance times, that trying to correct them seems folly.
I'll instead simply list them and their corrected versions:
When you've finished eating, the only time your cutlery should show on the clockface of your plate is six o' clock. Knife and fork together, straight up and down the middle of the plate. Leaving them at some jaunty twenty-past eight nonsense just exposes your sloth and lack of social graces.
Wiping your mouth on anything other than your napkin or serviette is horrible. Using a napkin ain't rocket science: when you sit down, unfold it into your lap. Use it, replace it in your lap. When you're finished, fold it neatly, preferrably with the now-stained section inside, and leav it next to your plate.
By all means gulp your drink; try to get as much into your body as you can between bites... ...if you want to look like an alcoholic, or someone who derives their pleasure mainly from visceral, central-nervous sources like feeling your stomach stretching. Sip.
If you want something to be passed to you, ask for it by name. There is -as far as I'm aware- no shortage of air or words in The Land, so you're free to be as verbose as you want when asking for something. Don't just point and grunt; you look stupid when you do that.
The absence of the custom of waiting for one's fellow diners to be served before starting owes as much to the almost complete lacky of social empathy here as it does to anything else. Suffice it to say that it's extremely rare to see people acknowledge this custom and most people don't even seem to notice how fragmented it makes the whole dining experience.
Icelanders, I have noticed in the last n years, have almost no sense of how their actions affect those around them They have an almost sociopathic disregard for other people, and this failure to wait for other diners is a classic example. This delightfully chewy and richly flavoured topic may or may not be the subject of a future blog.
Enough for now; my Rant Mode alarm is sounding and I really must save some content for future blogs.
This is a meme that's been churning over in my mind for at least eight years now and it's been growing as more and more evidence gets piled on. It's actually one of the reasons I created this blog, to get this garbage off my chest and to stop wasting spare mental CPU cycles on it.
I had sort of decided to take a responsible aproach to this, to do some fairly thorough research and make sure I have a balanced view of the issue, to make sure that when I spout fairly strong opinions I'm able to back them up and to defend myself. But then I though "Ah, bollocks. Just do it." Let someone correct me if I'm wrong (http://xkcd.com/386).
The thing is this. Icelanders like to think they're all sophisticated and worldly-wise and up with the Jónssons, and able to proudly rub shoulders with their Nordic and even Scandinavian counterparts, and have even had some fairly respectable HDI ratings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdi) to back it up recently.
But it's all bollocks! They're behaving like a bunch of social savages. The most generous I can be would be to describe them as a group of teenagers left home alone for a weekend. If countries were to be judged by their standards of etiquette and manners -and let's face it, they do sometimes get judged simply that way; isn't it called diplomacy?- Iceland would fail miserably.
I now I'm making some bold statements and quite frankly I find it rather difficult to give a toss who I upset: the truth needs to out. The people of this little skerry which I hold so dear are woefully behind in terms of social evolution and are making bloody fools of themselves because of it. I've been here long enough to work out what's going on and to see what most people are like, and here I present a brief list of common problems. Most of them stem from differences between social norms in Iceland and the way in which I was raised -a fairly middle-of-the-road Anglo-Saxon way- and of course we can debate at length the extent to which these conventions apply or not in Iceland.
In fact I'll go so far as to warn you, Icelanders: in this case you can't escape the truth or you social responsibility by crowing out the tired old mantra of "oh, but it's different here! We do things differently here because we're all so special and live in a special place and we're not like anyone else!". Bollocks. Utter horse manure. When it comes to how you interact with each other in your tiny little farm in the Westfjords you can do what you want, but in the modern paradigm Iceland is no longer so isolated that you can pretend that you have no contact with the outside world. You travel. People visit here, a lot, and pay damn good money for which they expect a certain internationally accepted standard of etiquette and manners. So invoking the "we're special because we sing like whales, eat stinky food and believe in elves" cry again is not going to cut it here.
There many aspects of the Icelanders' behaviour that merit comment, but for now I'm going to focus on matters of manners and etiquette; other quirks are big enough to merit their own blogs, not least becase a few of them tie neatly together into explanations of aspects of the national conscience.
What I present here is a straightforward guide for Icelanders to finally be as as cultured as they like to pretend they are whilst having a meal.
Mark my words carefully here: I write "having a meal" because to use the word "dining" would not be accurate. My fellow skerry-dwellers eat far too fast. A typical rythmn goes: cut, stab with fork, deliver to mouth, then whilst chewing, start cutting the next morsel. Not only is this downright rude, it's also antisocial and unhealthy. Where's the conversation? Where's the efficiant mastication? Isn't it the case that over half of the process of digestion should take place in the mouth?
I've been trying to get to the bottom of this and I've found out two or three reasons why people eat like hungry dogs here: i) They actively get taught to do so in infant and primary school. They get taught not to 'hang over' their food, and to hurry outside to play, ii) In a society in which everyone's a farmer (which Iceland was, just a few generations ago) and the growing season is very short, followed by fierce winters, there is no space for relaxed social dining during which the issues of the moment are ruminated as well as the food, and iii) whereas real countries like France or Germany or the UK or the USA have had anything from a few hundred to a few thousand years to develop social norms and etiquette, Iceland has had the social equivalent of about ten minutes. Social evolution here has simply been way too pragmatic to allow for such luxuries as civilised dining to develop.
The message in this case is very simple: cut your bite, put it in your mouth, then put your cutlery down. Chew slowly and carefully before swallowing, then when and only when your mouth is empty, may you speak.
Which takes us neatly on to the next faux pas that I see every day here. Literally every day. For some reason my beloved countrymen haven't learned that it's rude to talk with your mouth full of food. Eating lunch in the kitchen in my small company is a daily horror not only because of the turgidly boring food choice on offer, but mainly because of the animalistic display of behaviour. One particular employee, a middle-aged kerling with a face so sour that she looks like she is smelling someone else's fart, is a chief offender. Her normal talking voice is a high-piched Gatling variant of Icelandic but she continues with a mouth full of food and the effect is dreadful: she looks downright ignorant. I shudder to think how fellow diners at, for example, even a mid-range restaurant in Lyon, Geneva or Tokyo would react. What makes it worse is that she is far from the only offender; half the employees and even the CEO behave exactly the same way.
For heaven's sake, people, don't talk with your mouth full of food. It's disgusting and you look like white trash.
Fairly soon after I moved here I was 'dining' with family. As I raised my forkful of food to my mouth, the diner to my immediate right reached forward and left, leaning her body heavily against mine, and stretched across my personal space to where the water jug stood in the centre of the table. The food fell off my fork. I remember being shocked by this and wondering what sort of person this was, then as the weeks and years rolled by I saw that this was common behaviour here.
There really is no conception of personal space during dining, and hence no respect for it. The way in which I was raised -which I by no means hold up as a global standard, just normal- taught me that people do not touch each other during dinner. Everyone has their own personal space, elbows do not touch, knees do not touch under the table and one never, ever reaches across another person at the table: one asks to be passed whatever is needed.
The absence of this meme is again fairly obvious when one looks back into Icelandic history. Visit the wonderful Skogar Folk Museum and take a walk around their old buildings, go inside the beautifully built longhouse in þjórsádalur and you'll quickly understand that there simply was no space in these dwellings, so it's no surprise that the idea never sprung up.
But come on, people. You don't live in turf houses any more. You live in generic, generously-proportioned, Ikea-furnished, geothermally-heated houses and apartments now and the architects always plan nicely for a real dining table with place for everyone. I know; I've seen the plans. Learn the simple rules and stop behaving like apes while you eat.
There are quite a few more of these finer points of dining, but they seem so trivial, perhaps they really are just vestigial graces inherited from some Victorian or renaissance times, that trying to correct them seems folly.
I'll instead simply list them and their corrected versions:
When you've finished eating, the only time your cutlery should show on the clockface of your plate is six o' clock. Knife and fork together, straight up and down the middle of the plate. Leaving them at some jaunty twenty-past eight nonsense just exposes your sloth and lack of social graces.
Wiping your mouth on anything other than your napkin or serviette is horrible. Using a napkin ain't rocket science: when you sit down, unfold it into your lap. Use it, replace it in your lap. When you're finished, fold it neatly, preferrably with the now-stained section inside, and leav it next to your plate.
By all means gulp your drink; try to get as much into your body as you can between bites... ...if you want to look like an alcoholic, or someone who derives their pleasure mainly from visceral, central-nervous sources like feeling your stomach stretching. Sip.
If you want something to be passed to you, ask for it by name. There is -as far as I'm aware- no shortage of air or words in The Land, so you're free to be as verbose as you want when asking for something. Don't just point and grunt; you look stupid when you do that.
The absence of the custom of waiting for one's fellow diners to be served before starting owes as much to the almost complete lacky of social empathy here as it does to anything else. Suffice it to say that it's extremely rare to see people acknowledge this custom and most people don't even seem to notice how fragmented it makes the whole dining experience.
Icelanders, I have noticed in the last n years, have almost no sense of how their actions affect those around them They have an almost sociopathic disregard for other people, and this failure to wait for other diners is a classic example. This delightfully chewy and richly flavoured topic may or may not be the subject of a future blog.
Enough for now; my Rant Mode alarm is sounding and I really must save some content for future blogs.
Monday, November 28, 2011
I've created a Tvitterrrrrr account, as my Icelandic friends would call it, delightfully trilling the 'r' and not caring that they haven't a clue how to pronounce the 'w' properly. On Twitter I can be found under @thecodwars.
The surprisingly poor distinction between 'w' and 'v' amongst the Icelanders is a source of much wasted intellectual energy for me. How can one nation get it so wrong? How can they care so little about sounding silly?
The answer lies possibly in the difference in naming: whereas in English the letter bears the name 'double-u', in Icelandic it's called 'tvöfaldvaff', or 'double-v'.
I am much vexed about this issue. I hope to remember to write more about it later.
The surprisingly poor distinction between 'w' and 'v' amongst the Icelanders is a source of much wasted intellectual energy for me. How can one nation get it so wrong? How can they care so little about sounding silly?
The answer lies possibly in the difference in naming: whereas in English the letter bears the name 'double-u', in Icelandic it's called 'tvöfaldvaff', or 'double-v'.
I am much vexed about this issue. I hope to remember to write more about it later.
Jæja...
The time to start has finally come.
I make no predictions or promises about the content of this blog. I'm trying to avoid stating a purpose more noble than simply venting my spleen.
I reserve the right to blend Icelandic into my writings; I've been here long enough to do so with sang froid and I don't necessarily care if I get my spelling or grammar wrong. None of my petty crimes again the noble language can be as heinous as the day-to-day abuse meted out by the Icelanders on their own language: the tök orð, the pretentious use of Danish and the woefully poor grasp of even basic English.
And, you know what? I don't care if I don't hold the moral high ground. I care less than I care about the horror of starting not only a sentence but a whole paragraph with the word 'and'. I don't claim to be perfect in any way whatsoever, so IMHO that leaves me the option of being as contradictory and hypocritical as I want.
I make no predictions or promises about the content of this blog. I'm trying to avoid stating a purpose more noble than simply venting my spleen.
I reserve the right to blend Icelandic into my writings; I've been here long enough to do so with sang froid and I don't necessarily care if I get my spelling or grammar wrong. None of my petty crimes again the noble language can be as heinous as the day-to-day abuse meted out by the Icelanders on their own language: the tök orð, the pretentious use of Danish and the woefully poor grasp of even basic English.
And, you know what? I don't care if I don't hold the moral high ground. I care less than I care about the horror of starting not only a sentence but a whole paragraph with the word 'and'. I don't claim to be perfect in any way whatsoever, so IMHO that leaves me the option of being as contradictory and hypocritical as I want.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)